POETRY  INTERPRETATION

Last Updated:  8/10/03

• ENTRIES.     As many as THREE students from  grade levels 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 may be entered in the POETRY INTERPRETATION District Contest from each school.  Designated adults representing each school will select contestants to represent the campus at the District Meet based on their abilities and interest in public speaking and poetry reading, as well as other  factors, which  are  decided  upon by each school.  

• NATURE OF THE CONTEST.      Students in the Poetry Interpretation Contest select a published poem or group of poems, prepare an introduction to the poem(s), and present the poem(s) with the introduction in a six-minute time limit at the contest.   There is no minimum time limit.  Better presentation are at least three minutes in length, however.   Contestants who exceed the allotted six minutes shall be disqualified.
Each year the selection category alternates: 2004-Poetry; 2005-Prose; 2006-Poetry.

• CHOOSING A SELECTION.     Students  who  consider the following in selecting their poems have the best chance of being successful in competition while enjoying the process of preparing for the presentation.  Ask these questions:
1)    Do I LIKE THE selection?  A student must enjoy a selection if he or she will spend time thinking about it, analyzing it, and rehearsing it.

2)    Is the selection appropriate for ME?  Literary selections written by and for adults offer problems for elementary and middle school students because the levels of experience, understanding, and vocabulary are so very different from their own. Select poems that present  a young person’s point of view, situations that you can identify with, and themes that you understand.

3)    Does the selection work for poetry interpretation? This judgment must not be made too hastily. Almost all selections become richer and fuller as students work with them; a few selections, despite rehearsal and exploration, simply do not benefit from an oral reading.

• DOCUMENTATION.     A requirement of the contest, documentation simply means that the contestant brings to the contest printed information that proves that the work is a poem, and not a piece of prose or a portion of a play or drama reading.  A photocopied passage from an encyclopedia, anthology of poems, or other printed resource provides the best documentation.  Some works may not have printed sources that indicate specifically that they are poems, and sometimes rhyming works in children’s literature are actually classified as prose. Therefore, a library can usually provide the information about the work through reference in the Duey Decimal System.  Ask the librarian for assistance.  A jacket cover usually does not provide the necessary information; however, the cover along with the table of contents that lists the poem is acceptable documentation.  Contestants may also bring the actual literary source from which they got the poem(s) to competition, if necessary.  Please be aware that failure to present the documentation will result in disqualification, even if it seems obvious that the work is a poem.  Consider documentation an opportunity to find out more about the work you are presenting.

• THE INTRODUCTION.     Students who select a poem that works for them also have an easier time developing a short introduction.  The introduction should prepare the audience to hear the poem(s).  It may be dramatic; it may or may not say something about the poet; it may describe the setting of the poem(s); and/or it may introduce other aspects of the literature. It is important to remember to keep the introduction fairly short because the poetry reading, including the introduction, must not exceed six minutes.

• APPROPRIATE GESTURES.  Responsive use of the body (i.e., spontaneous changes in posture, gesture, and “limited” place-to-place movement) are permissible.  However, this active use of the body should:
(A)    be appropriate to the demands of the selection;
(B)    be a natural outgrowth from the literature to
               be performed;
(C)    not call attention to itself; and
(D)    be limited in scope.
The judge’s opinion in this matter is final.  
Although the poem(s) may be presented from memory, it is recommended that the speaker hold a transcript of the poem(s) in a small, dark colored folder or notebook that does not detract from the presentation.  Holding a transcript can prevent the overuse of gestures.  Remember that voice inflection and interpretation of the different characters and the scene are the most important components of a great poetry interpretation.  The voice, not the body, should  convey the meaning and feeling in the literary work.

• APPROPRIATE ATTIRE.    Although contestants are not expected to wear a suit and tie or dresses, appearance can be a factor in the judges’ overall impression of the presentation.  Contestants should not wear logo clothing (other than the PSIA State Meet t-shirt), especially if the logo is of the school or symbols of the school attended.  Clothing that appears to be a costume representing your poetic piece is not acceptable.  If a contestant wears one of these unacceptable pieces of clothing, the contest director may have the student turn his/her shirt wrong-side out, or otherwise change clothes.  Although dress is not a matter for disqualification; it is, however, a rationale for deductions in ranking by the judge.  Have your parents and coaches interpret what clean, presentable clothing may be for your presentation, if you are unsure.

• WHAT HAPPENS IN THE CONTEST.    1) The contest director will announce the time and place that contestants and one adult should report for evaluation pick-up and/or awards presentation. (Alternates taking the place of absent registered contestants should be sure to let the contest director know as they enter the room to save time in roll call.) 2) The contest director/timekeeper will call speaker number 1.  3) Timing begins with the contestant’s first words of the presentation.  Because the PSIA events are meant to be educational, the contestants may remain in the contest room after their presentations (unless other arrangemnets have been made by the meet director), and audiences should be welcomed to the capacity of the room, but no one may enter the room once the contest has started.  The contestant will speak before a single judge or a panel of three judges.  (All speech events are judged by an odd number of judges.) When only 30 seconds are left in the allotted time for a speaker, the contest director, who also serves as the timekeeper, will hold up a “30 seconds left” card in order to assist the contestant in stopping the speech prior to the end of the time limit.

• ENTERING POETRY AND A CONTEST IN CONFLICT ON THE REQUIRED SCHEDULE.  
As a district and campus option (to be determined by the adults in charge of the contest on the campus), contestants may enter the Poetry Interpretation Contest AND the Ready Writing, Spelling, or Science contests, which are scheduled at the same time in either the preliminary or final round. Notification MUST be given to the meet director in writing that these contests are in conflict, in order that arrangements may be made for the Poetry contestant to speak first or second in the preliminary or final round, THEN go to the other contest.  No additional time will be given for the contest in which the contestant must arrive late. In most cases, very little time will have been lost if the guidelines are followed, and the contestant will be able to participate fully in both events.  Contestants entered in Poetry and Mathematics may also need to speak first.
 
• DISQUALIFICATIONS.     A contestant may be disqualified for only three infractions of the rules.  These are as follows:
1)  failing to provide an introduction;
2)  speaking over the  six-minute time alotted; and
3) failure to provide documentation of the type of  literary work being presented.  Other presentation flaws should be noted by the judge (not the contest director) on the evaluation sheet.
 
• ADVANCING TO THE FINAL ROUND.     If there are more than 9 students in the competition, two sections of the contest (preliminary round) will be held.  The top 3 ranked students will advance to the final round from each of the two “prelim” sections. Contestants may read the same poem(s) as they read in the preliminary round or a different poem in the final round.

• POSTING THE PRELIMINARY ROUND.
After judges have made their decisions in the preliminary rounds, contestants pick up their evaluations at the time and place designated on the schedule.  The evaluation forms to be used in this contest are found on the pages directly following this section of the PSIA Academic Handbook.  At this time the names of the contestants advancing to the final round will be announced in random order and posted on a designated bulletin board in a random speaking order for the final round.

• PREPARATION FOR CONTEST.     Read and follow all instructions provided in the “Information Pertaining to All Contests” section of the PSIA Academic Handbook.  Observe and practice with students all rules and procedures delineated in the “Instructions to the Contestant” and in the “Checklist for Contest Directors” and the”“Checklist for Judges.”  Preparation for the Poetry Interpretation Contest should include instruction in the curriculum objectives of public speaking.  Practice performing before an audience is essential.  Invitational meets with other schools provide the most effective practice, as well as boosting enthusiasm for the contestant.  You may wish to prepare your students for the excitement of winning as well as the disappointment of losing. All speech activities rely on the subjective opinion of a judge.  The philosophies and techniques of poetry reading differ widely, and your students need to be aware that their work may be evaluated by people with a variety of approaches to the field.  If you emphasize the joy of sharing literature rather than the necessity of a first place ranking, all your students will be winners, especially if they carry their love of literature into adulthood.

• PERSONNEL NEEDED FOR CONTEST.
1.  Contest Director/Timekeeper.   May be a knowledgeable coach of contestants in the contest.
3. Judge(s).  One experienced, qualified judge may judge preliminary rounds.  Three qualified judges are preferred.  An odd number of judges is required.

• JUDGING REQUIREMENTS (ADDITIONAL INFORMATION).     (See Contestant information) Judges for all PSIA speech contest should:
        1)  Hold a Language Arts, English, or Speech Communication education certification, OR be working on a degree in a speech field.
        2)  Have prior judging experience of at least three speech contests.  Contests may be invitational or intramural, but preferably, judging experience should be at the district or state level of PSIA competition.
These are the two “musts” in judging at this point of our program development.  We are asking that persons meeting these qualifications let your campus coordinator and your district director know of your expertise in order that you may fill a much-needed position at your District Meet.
 
We ask also that you let the PSIA state office know that you meet these criteria and volunteer to fill one of the 120 much-needed positions at the two state meets.  It is our goal to fill these positions (3 judges per section) prior to the end of the district meet this year.   THANKS!

Go to Home Page | Go to Links Page

Staff Support
Patricia Walters, Ed.D., Executive Director
Phone: (817) 416-9504  OR Toll-Free:  888-972-7742
Fax: (817) 416-9576
E-mail: psia@flash.net