Acceptance,
Discipline & Hope: A Story of Recovery from CFIDS
By
Dean Anderson
Editor’s
Note: Reprinted with permission from the Winter, 1996 CFIDS Chronicle,
the magazine of the CFIDS Association of America.
-
Bruce Campbell
Author’s
Note: I read with great interest Thomas Day Oates’ article
“Recovery,” in the Summer 1995 Chronicle. I agree that we each have
the means to positively impact our health, which for some PWCs may mean
partial, and for others substantial, recovery. That Mr. Oates is
an extraordinarily spiritual and disciplined person I have no doubt.
However, reading between the lines of his inspiring story one can see
circumstances not available to all PWCs [People with CFIDS]. I hope that
my story will provide encouragement to those who, although ill, must
continue to support themselves and who perhaps aren’t as spiritual as
Mr. Oates.
During
my eight-year struggle with CFIDS, I supported myself by working part
time the first several years, returning to full-time work as I gradually
improved. From these circumstances it may seem that I wasn’t as
sick as a lot of PWCs, and this is probably true. I would estimate
that I “functioned” at about 60 percent of my “healthy” level,
but my quality of life was reduced significantly below that
(functionality not being everything in life, regardless of what the
Social Security Administration folks say). Each day was a struggle
to keep my job and the hope alive of better days to come.
Today,
nine years after the onset of my illness, I consider myself
“substantially recovered,” a term which I know begs defining.
To me “recovered” means that I no longer dread relapses and that I
have returned to a full and fulfilling life. It doesn’t mean
that I can indulge myself in certain former hobbies, such as endurance
competitions. It does mean that I can engage in vigorous outdoor
activities at a level more or less normal for a person in his early
fifties and that I can work full time, travel and enjoy an active social
life. For these blessings I pay a small price: I live within
certain limits. I pay attention to my body and stay in touch with
my emotions. I accept a daily health regimen and I don’t ever
burn my candle at both ends.
I
improved somewhat during my first five years with CFIDS, but the biggest
gains occurred after the fifth year. I don’t subscribe to the notion
that one’s chances of recovery diminish after a certain amount of
time. To believe that is, in my view, to reject the idea that one can,
through one’s attitude and behavior, affect one’s recovery. At the
same time I don’t believe any of the remedies, medicines or food
supplements I tried helped me one bit.
To
Accept or Not to Accept CFIDS?
Over
the years, I read several reports by recovered or improving PWCs where
they said they started improving after “accepting” or “resigning
themselves” to their illness. Until recently I rejected this
mind-set as defeatist or fatalistic. In America we are taught from
early childhood that succeeding in life is important and that striving
is the key to achievement. I initially viewed the healing process
as one in which I would succeed through determination and hard work.
I realize now that there is a problem with this type of thinking.
It leads to a roller-coaster ride of emotional highs and lows.
During the years that I consciously “tried” to get well, I perceived
remissions as steps up a ladder to recovery. The path would be
ever upward. When relapses inevitable followed, I was devastated
by the apparent failure of my will and my conscious efforts.
I
believe today that a certain kind of acceptance may be important to
recovery. It is not a resignation to one’s fate as a sick
person. Rather, it is acceptance of the reality of illness and of
the need to lead a different kind of life, perhaps for the rest of my
life. I know absolutely that I will never again enter a foot or
ski race. I know I will live for the rest of my life within
certain modest limitations. I know that the term “moderation,”
which I previously despised, applies to me in spades and is in fact the
key to my future well-being. The “effort” required to recover
from CFIDS is an exercise in discipline and hopefulness, not
determination and striving. The discipline required is exactly the
opposite of the discipline so valued in the scholar, professional or
athlete. It is the discipline to recognize and adhere to one’s
known limitations and to follow a strict regimen without periodically
lapsing. It is the discipline not to succumb to family or societal
pressures to get back into the rat-race. It is the will to protect
oneself, to not over-do and to find ways to be productive and find
fulfillment under unfamiliar and difficult circumstances.
The
Healing Attitude
I
can
attest to the value of some of Thomas Day Oates’ coping and healing
techniques described in the Summer ’95 CFIDS Chronicle: (1) keeping a
daily journal of the substances and activities which seem, no matter how
subtly, to contribute either to remission or relapse; (2) categorizing
all foods and drinks as either stressors or helpers; (3) eliminating
negative influences (people, attitudes, emotions, etc); and (4) learning
to be alone in silence (and especially learning to live without
television).
During
the first few years of my illness, I harbored resentment and anger
toward my ex-wife, former bosses and business associates whom I felt had
short-changed me. I also felt a certain amount of guilt and regret
over past failures and problems I had caused others, including my
children.
Perhaps
it is healthy to allow negative emotions to flow freely in and out of
one’s consciousness, but it is decidedly unhealthy to allow negative
emotions to control one’s thought patterns and being. If I
can’t enjoy a book, a favorite piece of music or a conversation
without my mind drifting off into regret or revenge fantasies, then I
know my subconscious is in control. There are two basic ways to
deal with this: either delve into your past and try and get at the root
of learned “programs” which usually stem from childhood, or work at
changing your attitude. I have found the latter more productive.
As Alcoholics Anonymous teaches, changing one’s behavior is a good way
to develop a more positive attitude.
Onset
and Initial Stage
In
December 1986, feeling sick with flu-like symptoms, I went to a general
practitioner for a checkup and was diagnosed with a mild case of
mononucleosis, which the doctor said was self-limiting and normally
required six weeks to three months for complete recovery. When I
asked him if I should curtail my ski training and racing (I had been
active in cross country ski racing for about 10 years at that point) he
said no, if I felt good enough to train, “go for it.” I skied
conservatively two or three more times and then decided to stop training
entirely. However, in mid-February, having felt normal for a week
or so, I skied a 30 km course in Sun Valley, Idaho, where my two
children were competing. The next day the flu-like symptoms
returned in force and worsened in the following weeks. I
experienced memory lapses, difficulty concentrating, crushing fatigue
after a few hours in the office, insomnia, low-grade fevers, tender
lymph nodes and a constant sore throat. With my company’s
concurrence, I reduced my work schedule from over 10 hours a day to six
or fewer.
My
wife asked me for a divorce the same month I became sick and I moved out
of the family house. I accepted the need for and reality of the
divorce intellectually, but felt emotionally out of control for several
weeks. A toxic brew of grief, anger, sadness, frustration and
resentment ebbed and flowed.
In
May 1987, not having even begun to recover, I saw Dr. Daniel Peterson,
whom I read about in an article about “yuppie flu.” Two months
later Dr. Peterson after conducting a series of tests to exclude other
possible diseases, he diagnosed CFIDS.
I
saw Dr. Peterson periodically for the next eight years and regard his
steadfast support as invaluable. To be sure that I wasn’t
developing complications or new problems, he periodically ordered
various tests. When some started to indicate improvement (after
three to four years), it gave me a basis for hope. Above all, he
listened and let me know that he believed I was doing everything I could
to recover.
Developing
a Recovery Strategy
During
my first year of illness, I didn’t know anyone else with CFIDS.
I didn’t know where to turn for advice and support. My basic
attitude was that if anyone recovered, I would. Dr. Peterson’s
best guess was that, in general, about 20 percent of PWCs recover, while
60 percent improve somewhat over time. I visited a chiropractor, a
homeopathic doctor and an acupuncturist without any perceived benefit.
I began to realize that recovery might depend solely on my own efforts,
and with that insight, I began formulating a recovery strategy.
My
first consideration was whether or not to work (and, if so, whether
full- or part-time). I decided to work six hours a day, which I
estimated to be the maximum time I could cope (in spite of feeling
terrible) and also the maximum time I could work without risking
deterioration of my condition over time. The company I worked for
developed renewable energy sources. My employers were primarily
interested in my ability to get power plants up and running. I
believed I still could, especially if I could remove myself from the
pressures of the home office. I sought assignments in remote
areas, where I could control my daily schedule without others looking
over my shoulders as I came and went. Controlling my schedule
freed up time for naps, meditation, visualization and relaxation.
My
second decision was whether or not to exercise. Dr. Peterson
recommended that I do light exercises for 10 to 15 minutes a day.
After a few months I decided I had to risk doing more because my sleep,
appetite and hopeful attitude were being compromised. I felt both
ill and slothful and watched in horror as my muscles atrophied.
Before getting sick I was an exercise junkie, hooked on a daily fix of
endorphins and adrenalin.
I
experimented systematically with progressive levels of exercise. I
used a heart-rate monitor to gauge the intensity of my workouts and I
carefully recorded exercise duration and how I felt before, during and
after each workout, and especially how I felt the next day. The
penalty for over-exercise was a relapse which started about 24 hours
after the infraction and lasted a week or more. Once, when I let
someone talk me into going hiking, the penalty was a relapse of several
months.
Third,
I questioned what treatments to take. I found that other seemingly
credible PWCs were experimenting with an array of remedies, including
various herbs, tricyclic anti-depressants, gamma globulin, Kutapressin,
homeopathic treatments and vitamins in heavy doses. I tried
several of these without ever noticing improvement.
Fourth,
I had to decide how to live on a daily basis. Should my regimen be
flexible or rigorous? Should it allow for spontaneity and surprise
or be carefully structured and controlled. Where did family and
friends fit in?
Living
a Recovery Strategy
During
the first three or four years of my illness I didn’t know that I was
living a recovery strategy, because I didn’t know whether or not I was
recovering. I was experiencing a frustrating cycle of relapses and
remissions with no end in sight. The penalty for each
“overdoing” mistake seemed far out of proportion to its seriousness.
After about two years, and in spite of setbacks, I realized that if I
didn’t exceed my known limits, I probably wouldn’t decline.
But I wanted to recover.
Exercise:
I learned that by paying close attention to my body I could do far more
exercise without relapsing than Dr. Peterson thought I should be able
to. I came to understand that the best time for me to exercise was
in the late afternoon or early evening after a nap. Exercising in
the morning left me exhausted by mid-afternoon. I came to
appreciate the importance of exercising in pleasant surroundings and in
a calm mood. I learned that right kind, intensity and duration of
exercise for me. This consisted of a combination of alternately
jogging and walking (depending on how I felt) and strength exercises
(such as push-ups). The important thing was to not force the pace
and to allow adequate rest between exercises.
I
received immediate benefits from exercise: improved appetite, more
restful sleep, a sense of accomplishment and an instantaneous feeling of
peace and hope. Perhaps most important was learning to enjoy
exercise without succumbing to the urge to compete or “train,” which
meant I had to give up any idea of progressing - of doing more push-ups
or of jogging farther or faster. Eventually, I was able to
increase the exercise (years later, not weeks or months), but it was a
bonus of recovery, not a conscious goal. Had I set training goals,
as healthy people do, I would have invited not only a succession of
relapses, but also discouragement and perhaps demoralization.
Work:
I gradually learned to pace myself to stay within my limits. A
lunch break out of the office was helpful, especially if I ate a light
salad or pasta dish and time was left for 15 minutes of upright dozing
or meditation. Leaving the office by 4:00, whenever possible, was
important. Following work, a full-hour nap followed by 20 minutes
of healing visualization made exercising in the evening thinkable.
On business trips, a nap on arrival at the hotel put me in touch with my
body and shut off the adrenalin. I learned to say “no” to late
dinners. I didn’t exercise on business trips, because I lost
touch with my energy level when out of my home environment. I
learned not to eat after 7:00 pm and never to take overnight flights, no
matter how many of my peers were doing it.
Social
Life: It was difficult to decide whom to tell about my illness. I
told long-standing friends, close business associates and women I dated
after my divorce. These people needed to understand the reasons
behind my restricted activities and schedule. To others, including
most business contacts, I avoided disclosing it and tried to act as
normal as possible. I suffered through many a workday feeling like
death warmed over, but putting on a show of normalcy.
It
always saddened me when fellow support group members would say “my
doctor (or husband or wife) says I’m practicing illness behavior and
wants me to act normal.” These are exactly words PWCs don’t
need to hear and shouldn’t take to heart. What they do need to
develop is the fortitude to accept their condition, even when others
refuse to, and the discipline to do the things and adopt the hopeful
attitude which will put them on a path to recovery. I hope that my
experience may help other PWCs to find their own paths to recovery.