From the 'American Rifleman', November, 1980, page 51. COURT Orders Return of NRA Museum Pieces In a court decision that included a virtual condemnation of BATF civil forfeiture practices, a U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C. has ruled that seven NRA Museum display pieces confiscated more than two years ago by the BATF be returned to the National Rifle Association. The ruling was made in early August by U.S. Judge Oliver Gasch who found "no justification" for the seizure, and, in fact, noted that BATF's action was "highly unusual" in that the "Government has seized items from a recognized museum." Judge Gasch emphatically rejected the BATF's contention that the NRA was in possession of unregistered "machine guns," "destructive devices," and "other weapons." The seven display pieces included four unusually rare specimens of rifles-a prototype Colt AR15, a Heckler and Kock G3, a Springfield Armory T44 and a Harrington and Richardson T48. Two Gyrojet pistols designed to fire a miniature rocket-like projectiles were also confiscated. The seventh item seized was a sectioned model, or cutaway Lee Enfield bolt action rifle designed as a training aid to demonstrate the rifle's mechanism. All of the items were incapable of firing, either by original design, or by subsequent "dewatting" prior to their inclusion in the NRA Museum. Much of the case hinged on the testimony of expert witnesses and on the court's interpretation of what constitutes a firearm, a machine gun or other destructive device, and what the term "readily restorable: means under provisions of the National Firearms Act. The Judge ruled that the four "rifles," which BATF maintained were machine guns and were "readily restorable" to automatic firing capability, were all prototype models designed for museum exhibition and not designed to fire at all. The expert witnesses for both sides agreed that in order to make the items capable of firing, "a shop in which the tools would cost approximately $65,000 would be required and expert gunsmith services would be necessary." Judge Gasch noted that this was clearly "not within the coverage reasonably anticipated by the key word 'readily.' " As far as "readily restorable," the Judge rejected the claim, saying that BATF was "seeking to demonstrate that the items can be converted into something the item was never designed to be in the first place." Of key significance in the case was Judge Gasch's ruling that possession of the "frame or receiver" alone, without also having the necessary parts to convert a weapon, did not constitute possession of a machine gun. The Judge noted that the NRA was not in possession of any such "conversion parts" and that "a reasonable reading of the statute (National Firearms Act) would require the conclusion that the term "frame or receiver" is not contemplated in isolation but together with the possession of additional parts from which the machine gun could be assembled." The court also ruled that the two Gyrojet pistols, which could neither discharge a shot nor expel a projectile, and for which ammunition was virtually unavailable, were not "firearms, destructive devices...or readily converted" to firing condition, they did not require registration. Responding to BATF's contention that the cutaway Lee Enfeild rifle required registration because it had a barrel length less than 16 inches, Judge Gasch ruled that it was simply not designed as a weapon," that it was "a demonstration item or display piece and not a firearm." Judge Gasch further noted that "the Government has failed to prove that the item is not registered," citing evidence that the previous owner, prior to transferring the cutaway to the NRA, had, in fact, registered it with the BATF, thus demonstrating "the incompleteness of the Bureau's records" covering Title II weapons under the National Firearms Act. ................................................................. Article furnished curtesy of NRA Research Department. My thanks to Doug Wicklund, Museum Curator and Cynth, Research Department, NRA.