Regional Bank Valuation Update
Valuation and Performance Spreadsheets for: ALAB, BOKF, BOH, BXS, CBSH, CBSS,
CFR, CNB, CYN, FHN, FNB, HBHC, PCBC, RF, TRMK, UB, UMBF, UMPQ, WTNY, ZION
ASBC, BBT, CBCF, CBH, CMA, FITB,
FMER, FULT, HBAN, MI, MTB, NAL, NCC, NTRS, ONB, SKYF, SNV, STT, SUSQ, USB, VLY, WL

Factoids
 Current Issue

Daily #s
Yahoo Banks
Excite Banks

Banking News
Bankstocks.com

2007 Updates
May   Apr
Mar   Feb   Jan

2006 Updates
Dec   Nov   Oct
Sept   Aug   July
Jun6   May   April
Mar   Feb   Jan

2005 Updates
Dec   Nov   Oct
Sept   Aug   July
Jun   May   Aprl
Mar   Feb   Jan

2004 Updates
Dec   Nov   Oct
Sept   Aug   July
Jun   May   Aprl
Mar   Feb   Jan

2003 Updates
Dec   Nov   Oct


Q2 Ending Regional Banks Metrics

    Regional banks live in a 'what have you done for me lately' kind of world. For proof, of the 16 banks that had their 2007 EPS estimate increases or decreases of less than 4% since the first of the year, 13 beat the sector median yearly price gain - which is a loss of 6.5% - and the average total return of that group is 0.1% [at least it was positive]. Of the 25 that had EPS estimate decreases of more than 4%, only 7 of that 25 beat the sector median yearly price gain and the group's total return for the year is -10.95%. To understand the year to date price movements - look at EPS revisions.
    Every other metric failed to be very predictive. A good example is Q1-07 ending net interest margins. The 21 banks that had NIMs above 3.6% had an average a total return of -7.26% while the group of 21 banks that had NIMs below 3.6% had an average total return of -3.88%.
    Commentators have said that the individual investor can have superior long term returns by investing in indiviual stocks if they keep their long term focus. The stats for the first two quarters of 2007 show that the market did not have a long term focus. So the lack of predictivity so far this year of the metrics I follow could thus be taken as a good sign using such logic.


Home Page    Factoids    Previous Update