Entomology Circular No. 369
March/April 1995
The Southern
Pine Beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann
(Coleoptera: Scolytidae)*
**James R. Meeker, Wayne N. Dixon, and John
L. Foltz
Figures 1-3. Dendroctonus frontalis
Zimmermann. 1) Pitch tubes on outer bark; 2) S-shaped galleries in inner
bark; 3) adult (2-4 mm in length). Photography credit: J. R. Meeker
(Fig. 1); W. N. Dixon (Fig. 2); USDA Forest Service (Fig. 3).
Introduction:
The southern pine beetle (SPB), Dendroctonus frontalis
Zimmermann, is the most destructive insect pest of pine in the southern
United States. A recent historical review estimated that SPB caused $900
million of damage to pine forests from 1960 through 1990 (Price et al.
1992). This aggressive tree killer is a native insect that lives
predominantly in the inner bark of pine trees. Trees attacked by SPB often
exhibit hundreds of resin masses (i.e., pitch tubes) on the outer
tree bark (Fig. 1). SPB feed on phloem tissue where they construct winding
S-shaped or serpentine galleries (Fig. 2). The galleries created by both the
adult beetles and their offspring can effectively girdle a tree, causing its
death. SPB also carry, and introduce into trees, blue-stain fungi. These
fungi colonize xylem tissue and block water flow within the tree, also
causing tree mortality (Thatcher and Conner 1985). Consequently, once SPB
have successfully colonized a tree, the tree cannot survive, regardless of
control measures. When beetle populations are low (endemic), attacks are
generally restricted to senescent, stressed or damaged pines; however,
epidemics periodically occur (Thatcher et al. 1980). During
epidemics, SPB infestations often begin in weakened or injured trees, but
the high beetle populations can invade and overcome healthy vigorous trees
by attacking in large numbers over a short period of time (Thatcher et
al. 1980). Widespread and severe tree mortality can occur during
epidemics. SPB spots (groups of infested trees) may expand at rates up to 50
ft. (15 m)/day, and uncontrolled infestations may grow to thousands of acres
in size (Ron Billings, Texas Forest Service, personal communication). SPB
attacks are not limited to conventional forest sites; they also may kill
high-value trees in yards, parks, and other ornamental settings (Thatcher
et al. 1978). Because of the seriousness of SPB infestations, care
should be taken not to confuse SPB with the less aggressive but more common
pine bark beetles of Florida, the pine engravers (Ips spp.) and the
black turpentine beetle (D. terebrans (Olivier)) (Dixon 1984, 1986).
Description:
Adults are 2-4 mm in length, short-legged, cylindrical and brown to black in
color (Fig. 3). The broad and prominent head has a distinct notch or frontal
groove on male beetles. Females possess a broad, elevated, transverse ridge
(mycangium) along the anterior pronotum. The rear end or abdomen of adults
is rounded. Eggs are ca. 1.5 X 1.0 mm, oval in shape, shiny, opaque and
pearly white. Larvae range in size from 2-7 mm in length and are wrinkled,
legless, yellowish-white, with reddish-colored heads. Pupae have the same
general color of larvae and the same general form and size of adults. Callow
(new) adults progressively change in color from yellowish- white to
yellowish-brown to reddish-brown to finally become dark brown (Thatcher
et al. 1980).
Distribution:
The SPB occurs in a generally continuous distribution across the southern
and southeastern U.S. (AL, AR, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN,
TX, VA, WV), roughly coinciding with the distribution of loblolly pine,
Pinus taeda L. SPB has occurred as far north as PA and NJ. SPB also
occurs from AZ and NM south through Mexico and Central America into northern
Nicaragua (Thatcher et al. 1980). Although range maps indicate that
SPB may occur throughout the state of Florida, there are no known records of
SPB outbreaks south of Marion Co. (Chellman and Wilkinson 1975; Price et
al. 1992).
Hosts:
SPB will infest and kill all species of pine within its distribution
(Thatcher et al. 1980). In the southern U.S., the preferred hosts are
loblolly pine, shortleaf pine (P. echinata Mill.), pond pine (P.
serotina Michx.), and Virginia pine (P. virginiana Mill.)
(Thatcher and Barry 1982). In Florida, SPB will also readily attack and kill
spruce pine (P. glabra Walter), and sand pine (P. clausa
(Chapman ex Engelm.) Vasey ex. Sarg. (Chellman and Wilkinson
1975). Slash pine (P. elliottii Engelm.) and longleaf pine (P.
palustris Mill.) are generally considered to be more resistant to SPB
attacks, but during outbreaks even healthy trees of these species can be
successfully colonized (Belanger et al. 1993; Belanger and Malac
1980).
Biology:
Adult female SPB are responsible for host selection (Thatcher et al.
1980). After locating a suitable host tree, a female beetle bores through
the bark to initiate gallery construction in the inner phloem. Soon after
initial attack, females emit an aggregation pheromone (frontalin), which
attracts males and more females to the tree. This pheromone, in conjunction
with host odors stemming from resin exudation at attack points, attracts
more SPB to the tree. The aggregation of beetles results in a mass attack
over a short period of time (Dixon and Payne 1979). Mass-attacking enables
the beetles to overcome the natural defense mechanism of the tree, its resin
production system. Resin under pressure within the tree can successfully
force out or pitch out beetles if there are only a few beetles and the tree
is relatively healthy. Mass-attacking SPB deplete the resin production
capabilities of the tree causing resin flow to cease, after which point the
tree is easily overcome. Mating soon takes place and females begin to
construct long, winding S-shaped galleries that cross over each other. These
galleries are packed with frass and boring material by males. Up to 30 eggs
are deposited in niches along each gallery. Parent adults may then reemerge
from the tree 1-20 days following oviposition and proceed to attack the same
tree or another (Thatcher et al. 1980).
Eggs
hatch 3-9 days following oviposition. Larvae feed in the inner phloem and
construct winding galleries perpendicular to parent egg galleries. As larvae
develop, they progressively tunnel towards the outer bark. During the fourth
and final larval instar, the legless grubs move to the outer bark and form a
pupal cell. The pupal stage lasts 5-17 days, before insects turn into callow
adults. Callow adults remain under the bark for 6-14 days while their
cuticle hardens and darkens. The young adults then bore an exit tunnel
directly through the outer bark, leaving an open "shot" hole behind.
Generally, the emerging beetles fly off to attack another tree (Thatcher
et al. 1980). Adult beetles are capable of flying ca. 2 mi. (3 km), and
it is estimated that during dispersal phases, half of the beetles travel
more than 0.43 mi. (0.69 km) (Turchin and Thoeny 1993). The duration from
egg to adult ranges from 26-60 days. There may be as many as 7-9 generations
per year in Florida.
SPB
exhibit behavioral changes with changes in the seasons. In the South,
emergence of overwintering beetles has been correlated with the blossoming
of flowering dogwood (Cornus florida L.) in the spring (Thatcher and
Barry 1982). This spring emergence represents the primary dispersal phase of
SPB, during which beetles often initiate multiple and widespread
infestations. During the summer months, beetle development is hastened and
infestations tend to proliferate and expand very rapidly. SPB populations
undergo a secondary dispersal phase in the fall, tending to produce
scattered small infestations. These infestations typically remain small and
dispersed during the winter months when beetle activity is slowest (Thatcher
et al. 1980).
Outbreaks:
Outbreaks of this insect tend to be cyclical in occurrence. Outbreaks have
occurred on 6-12 year intervals and generally last for 2-3 years in areas
were SPB has long been a problem. Southwide, the time between outbreaks has
decreased while the intensity and distribution of each outbreak has
increased since 1960 (Belanger et al. 1993; Price et al.
1992). In Florida, infestations have been relatively few and small in the
past (Chellman and Wilkinson 1975, 1980; Dixon, unpublished data). Many
factors are involved in the development of outbreak conditions, such as the
abundance and susceptibility of preferred hosts, and weather patterns and
events (e.g., drought, storms). Historically, Florida has not
experienced many destructive SPB episodes probably because of the lack of
large contiguous areas of loblolly and shortleaf pine in susceptible stages.
However, an epidemic in and around Gainesville in Alachua Co. during 1994,
warrants reconsideration of the serious threat SPB poses to Florida's pine
forests. Forest inventory statistics indicate that over the last 25 years,
the acreage of loblolly pine forest in Florida has more than doubled from a
mere 337,000 ac. (136,380 ha) to more than 750,000 ac. (303,515 ha) (Brown
1987; Clark and Sheffield 1994; Knight 1969; McClure 1970). The current
acreage of loblolly pine also represents an all-time high since inventory
statistics were reported in 1949. This alarming increase and current level
of preferred host material suggests that SPB epidemics in Florida may be
more frequent, widespread and destructive in the future (Dixon, unpublished
data).
Survey and Detection:
Often the first noticeable indication of SPB attack is foliage
discoloration. Crowns of dying pines change color from green to yellow to
red before turning brown and falling from the tree. The time it takes for
these changes varies seasonally. Frequently, by the time crowns are red the
beetles have already vacated the tree. The earliest signs of possible SPB-attack
is the presence of brownish-orange boring dust and tiny white pitch pellets
accumulating at the base of the tree, in bark crevices, in nearby spider
webs, and on understory foliage. A more noticeable indication of SPB attack
is the presence of multiple popcorn size lumps of pitch (i.e., pitch
tubes) on the outer bark of pine stems (Fig. 1). These pitch tubes may occur
from near ground level up to 60-ft. (18-m) high, but may not develop at all
on trees severely weakened before beetle attack. The most diagnostic sign of
SPB activity is the presence of the winding S-shaped galleries that cross
over each other and are packed with boring dust and frass (Fig. 2). These
can be found by exposing a portion of the inner bark beneath pitch tubes or
by removing a section of bark. Another sign of possible SPB activity is the
presence of clear shot-like holes (ca. 1 mm in dia.) on the exterior bark
surfaces where SPB have emerged (Billings and Pase 1979; Thatcher and Conner
1985). SPB infestations typically kill groups of trees, which allows for
prioritizing investigations of suspect mortality.
Prevention and Control:
Preventative strategies for homeowners and forest managers include: 1)
planting more resistant species such as longleaf pine and slash pine in
place of loblolly pine and planting loblolly pine only on appropriate sites
(i.e., right tree for the right place); 2) thin overstocked, dense or
stagnant stands to a basal area of 80 sq. ft. per ac. (18 sq. m per ha) or
less; 3) maintain at least 25 ft. (8 m) distance between mature pines in
urban settings; 4) promote tree diversity in the landscape; 5) remove
damaged pines; 6) maintain tree health and vigor by supplemental watering
during extended dry periods; 7) minimize construction and logging damage to
pines and avoid soil compaction during operations; 8) minimize changes in
soil and water levels around pines; 9) conduct logging or land clearing
operations during coolest winter months; 10) shorten rotation ages to less
than 30 years; and 11) apply an approved insecticide to high-value trees
when the threat of SPB attack is imminent and the potential benefits
outweigh the costs and risks of chemical use. Remedial control measures to
suppress existing infestations are limited. Generally, the most effective
and desirable approach is to remove and process all SPB-infested pines as
soon as possible. Trees can be salvaged and SPB will be destroyed in the
milling process. If trees cannot be salvaged, the bark should be destroyed,
buried, or chipped and composted. In forested settings, it is recommended
that a 50-100 ft. (15-30 m) buffer strip of green uninfested trees also be
removed to ensure that recently infested trees are not left behind. Where
tree removal is not feasible, infested stems can be felled, bucked and
hand-sprayed with an approved insecticide. Where none of the above
approaches is feasible, infested trees, with or without a buffer strip, may
be simply felled toward the center of the spot. This cut-and-leave approach
has had limited use with variable results (Belanger and Malac 1980; Swain
and Remion 1981; Thatcher et al. 1978). Much research continues
toward the development of effective methods of utilizing semiochemicals to
suppress SPB infestations, but as yet, operational uses are still on the
horizon (Billings and Upton 1993; Hayes and Strom 1994; Payne and Billings
1989).
LITERATURE CITED
Belanger, R.P., Hedden, R.L. and P.L.
Lorio, Jr. 1993. Management
strategies to reduce losses from the southern pine beetle. Southern Journal
of Applied Forestry 17(3): 150-154.
Belanger, R.P. and B.F. Malac. 1980. Silviculture can reduce losses from
the southern pine beetle. USDA Forest Service, Combined Forest Pest Research
Development Program. Handbook No. 576. 17 p.
Billings, R.F. and H.A. Pase, III. 1979. A field guide for ground
checking southern pine beetle spots. USDA Forest Service, Combined Forest
Pest Research Development Program. Handbook No. 558. 19 p.
Billings, R.F. and W.W. Upton. 1993. Effectiveness of synthetic
behavioral chemicals for manipulation and control of southern pine beetle
infestations in East Texas. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment
Station. General Technical Report (93): 555-568.
Brown, M.J. 1987. Forest statistics for northeast Florida, 1987. USDA
Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Research Bulletin
SE-97. 53 p.
Chellman, C.W. and R.C. Wilkinson. 1975. Recent history of southern pine
beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimm., (Col.; Scolytidae) in Florida.
Florida Entomologist 58(1): 22.
Chellman, C.W. and R.C. Wilkinson. 1980. Southern pine beetle outbreaks
in Florida since 1974. Florida Entomologist 63(4): 515.
Clark, R.F., Jr. and R.M. Sheffield. 1994. Forest statistics for
northwest Florida, 1994. USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment
Station. Research Bulletin SE-148. 45 p.
Dixon, W.N. 1984. Ips engraver beetles. FDACS, Division of Forestry.
Forest and Shade Tree Pests Leaflet No. 2. 2 p.
Dixon, W.N. 1986. Black turpentine beetle. FDACS, Division of Forestry.
Forest and Shade Tree Pests Leaflet No. 4. 2 p.
Dixon, W.N. and T.L. Payne. 1979. Aggregation of Thanasimus dubius
on trees under mass-attack by the southern pine beetle. Environmental
Entomology 8(1): 178-181.
Hayes, J.L. and B.L. Strom. 1994. 4-Allyanisole as an inhibitor of bark
beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) congregation. Journal of Economic Entomology
87(6): 1548-1556.
Knight, H.A. 1969. Forest statistics for northwest Florida, 1969. USDA
Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Resource Bulletin
SE-14. 35 p.
McClure, J.P. 1970. Forest statistics for northeast Florida, 1970. USDA
Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Resource Bulletin
SE-15. 33 p.
Payne, T.L. and R.F. Billings. 1989. Evaluation of (S)-verbenone
applications for suppressing southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
infestations. Journal of Economic Entomology 82(6): 1702-1708.
Price, T.S., C. Doggett, J.L. Pye and T.P. Holmes, eds. 1992. A history
of southern pine beetle outbreaks in the southeastern United States.
Sponsored by the Southern Forest Insect Work Conference. The Georgia
Forestry Commission, Macon, GA. 65 p.
Swain, K.M., Sr. and M.C. Remion. 1981. Direct control methods for the
southern pine beetle. USDA Forest Service, Combined Forest Pest Research
Development Program. Handbook No. 575. 15 p.
Thatcher, R.C. and P.J. Barry. 1982. Southern pine beetle. USDA Forest
Service, Washington, D.C. Forest and Disease Leaflet No. 49. 7 p.
Thatcher , R.C. and M.D. Conner. 1985. Identification and biology of
southern pine bark beetles. USDA Forest Service, Washington D.C. Handbook
No. 634. 14 p.
Thatcher, R.C., J.E. Coster and T.L. Payne. 1978. Southern pine beetles
can kill your ornamental pine. USDA Forest Service, Combined Forest Pest
Research Development Program, Washington, D.C. Home and Garden Bulletin No.
226. 15 p.
Thatcher, R.C., J.L. Searcy, J.E. Coster and G.D. Hertel, eds. 1980. The
southern pine beetle. USDA, Expanded Southern Pine Beetle Research and
Application Program, Forest Service, Science and Education Administration,
Pineville, LA. Technical Bulletin 1631. 265 p.
Turchin, P. and W.T. Thoeny. 1993. Quantifying dispersal of southern
pine beetles with mark-recapture experiments and a diffusion model.
Ecological Applications 3(1): 187-198. P10-957-10
*Coleoptera: Scolytidae- Entomology Contribution No. 817, Bureau of
Entomolgy, Nematology, and Plant Pathology- Entomology Section.
**James R. Meeker- Forest Entomologist, FDACS, Division of Forestry, P.O.
Box 147100, Gainesville, FL 32614-7100.
**Wayne N. Dixon- Chief, Bureau of Entomolgy, Nematology, and Plant
Pathology, FDACS, Division of Plant Industry, P.O. Box 147100, Gainesville,
FL 32614-7100.
**John L. Foltz- University of Florida, Department of Entomolgy and
Nematology, Gainesville, FL 32611.
|