Have we got an investment for you.
It is the perfect addition to that stock and bond portfolio you are so
proud of. Picture this; it has a return of 10 to 15 percent
compound interest (or more!) over a 15-year horizon, and a
significant portion of the return is tax-deferred and usually reported as
capital gains. It has an historically positive alpha and a negative beta
when compared to the S&P 500, and research shows that converting a portion
of your holdings to this investment will increase the overall efficiency
of your portfolio. What is this new miracle investment vehicle?
Timberland!
If you are already a
timberland owner, this description may not make you stand up and shout
“Eureka, I’ve found it,” but it has not been all that long since Wall
Street investors finally sat up and took notice of the value of timberland
investments. To understand how these sophisticated investors came to
understand what timberland owners have known for years takes a short
history lesson and a visit to “Wall Street Investing 101.”
Up until the late 1970’s, timberland
investments were typically the domain of forest products companies and
farmers. Both had a somewhat similar outlook regarding the nature of
their holdings. The farmer’s main source of income was the cash crops he
sold each season from his agricultural land, and the timberland was a
hedge or special account he held in reserve for some unknown future need.
Farmers already owned the land and growing timber was all you could do
with those acres not suitable for crops. Many paper companies and
sawmills also owned timberland as a reserve or hedge against an uncertain
supply of raw materials from the general public. They, too, made their
income from their main investment (plant and equipment), and often their
timberland holdings were not thought of as an independent profit/loss
center.
A Counter-Cyclical
Hedge
For most farmers and
many timber companies, the return on their timberland investment was not
important. In fact, it was not even a major portion of their overall
business plan. It was subsidized by their main business and served only
as an asset to support that main business. During the late 1970’s and
into the 1980’s, a number of academic studies looked at the true nature of
timberland investing. These studies were based on evaluating the
financial risk and return of investments using CAPM, the Capital Asset
Pricing Model, and comparing those returns to the returns generated from
S&P 500 stocks. This is some of what these academic studies found when
comparing timberland returns to the S&P 500 Index:
In addition to these
benefits, since a significant portion of the return generated from
timberland investments is the result of biological growth and increasing
value of product classes as pulpwood becomes chip-n-saw and sawtimber,
there are no tax consequences related to this return until the timber is
sold. Interest and dividend payments are sources of annual income that
are usually taxed at ordinary income rates. As with growth stocks, most
of the return is taxed as capital gain income resulting in favorable tax
rates.
For Wall Street
investors, the conclusion drawn from these studies is that timberland
could be included in their long-term investment portfolio, and when
included, the diversity of the portfolio was increased, its risk was
reduced, and the return increased or stayed the same.
Get on the Bandwagon
Today there are many
Timberland Investment Management Organizations (TIMOs) pursuing the
acquisition of timberland investment for institutional investors across
the US. TIMOs act in a manner similar to stock and bond mutual funds or
investment advisors. They solicit corporate and institutional investors
who have pension-fund investments and invest a portion of their assets
in one of the TIMOs’ timberland “funds.” These funds have specific
investment criteria similar to the way a company like Fidelity Investments
has a small-cap fund or a blue chip fund. A TIMO may have a “Timberland
Fund #1” which is made up of four corporate contributors and is designed
to buy loblolly pine plantations; “Timberland Fund #2” may be totally
funded by one client with all types of timberland investments (planted
pine, natural pine, hardwood, etc.). The TIMO may be rounded out with
several other funds designed to stakeout a niche in the marketplace or
meet the needs of specific clients.
By the end of 1994, TIMO investment in timberland had
exceeded $2.5 billion in the U.S. There are now at least 15 TIMOs
operating from Atlanta to Boston to Seattle, and all points in between.
A significant amount of the work that consulting foresters do on an annual
basis is for these TIMOs. TIMOs require analysis of the quality of
timberlands offered for sale, stumpage price trend analysis, and future
timber market evaluations for upcoming purchases, as well as the
day-to-day management services, like timber sales and reforestation, for
properties they already own.
Outsmart the
Competition
How does all this
affect private landowners who already own timberland or individuals
thinking about making an investment in timberland? For one thing, it
bodes well for your investment strategy. If these institutional investors
are willing to invest 100’s of millions of dollars each year in
timberland, there must be something there in which to invest! Secondly,
these TIMO owners represent a stabilizing force in the marketplace for the
forest products industries. In contrast to developers who subdivide
properties and play the real estate market, TIMOs typically retain most of
the acquired property for at least 10 to 20 years and manage them as
timberland investments. This helps to provide forest products industries
with a reliable source of raw materials, which encourages those industries
to make additional investments in the area. This in turn provides private
landowners with multiple timber buyers and a strong marketplace for their
timber.
This change in the
timberland-investment marketplace, brought about by the increased number
of active investors, has several major implications for today’s private
landowner. The first is that the well-managed timberland you own is
probably worth more than you think. This could affect your retirement
planning strategy or your estate planning goals. A second impact is that
timberland owners who are trying to increase their holdings are unable to
find anything that is “reasonably priced” relative to the investment
numbers they are used to using. If you cannot understand how that “farm
down the road” sold for so much, you may need to evaluate what was really
for sale. The $100 per acre bare-land value for timberland not all that
many years ago has a $400 value today. Intensive management practices
have reduced rotation length and increased cash flow from timberlands.
That “fool who paid too much” for the tract down the road may have gotten
a bargain because he understood today’s markets and values.
An advantage that
TIMOs have over typical timberland owners is the ability to spread risk
over a portfolio of land ownerships. TIMOs manage hundreds of thousands
of acres spread over multiple states, whereas, the typical private
landowner may have one to five tracts in close proximity to one another.
The TIMO’s diversity reduces the likelihood a natural disaster or local
timber market collapse will significantly impact the total investment’s
return. One hurricane or mill closing can have devastating consequences
for small private landowners.
Private landowners, on
the other hand, have the ability to move quickly when local investment
opportunities present themselves. This local knowledge, together with
good investment decision-making can lead to sound long-term returns.
While some degree of risk from natural disasters is inevitable, private
landowners can decide to hold timber off the market during downturns in
local stumpage prices. They still maintain the return generated from
biological tree growth and the gain as pulpwood becomes chip-n-saw and
chip-n-saw becomes sawtimber. Because timber sales are done infrequently
(once or twice during an ownership), the timing of sales for individual
investors is critical. Forest Resource Managers, like Shaw, McLeod,
Belser & Hurlbutt, Inc., provide services every day to private investors
who are trying to keep up with these changes in the marketplace and make
sound investment decisions.
Wall Street investors
now know what rural landowners have known for years.
Biological tree growth, plus the increasing value
of products as you go from pulpwood to chip-n-saw to sawtimber, plus
historical increases in stumpage prices leads to a good long-term
investment strategy. Much of the return is a tax-deferred
capital gain, and you get to take the family (or investor-clients) out
hunting, fishing or for a nature walk and picnic while you checkup on your
investment. As an added bonus, Wal-Mart may decide that your tree farm
is the perfect location for its new distribution warehouse and make you an
offer you cannot refuse.
As the competition for
timberland investments increases, coupled with increasing stumpage prices
and land values, more sophisticated investment analysis is required to
keep up with the competition. So, check out the latest growth and yield
models for timberland in your area, check with your forestry professional
and keep your eyes and ears open. Your next timberland investment could
literally be “just around the corner.”
About the authors:
David E. Anderton, Jr. is manager of Mid-Atlantic Region, Shaw, McLeod,
Belser & Hurlbutt, Inc. He is also a member of Forest Landowner
Association, a registered forester in North Carolina and Maryland, and
tree farmer in three counties in Virginia.
Charlie Finley is a certified tree farmer in four counties in Virginia and
founder of Verbatim Editing, a company now four years old, which provides
writing, publishing and editorial services. He served for 25 years as
executive vice president of the Virginia Forestry Association, retiring in
1994.
Sources:
Clair H. Redmond & Frederick W. Cubbage.
1988. Portfolio Risk and Return from Timber Asset Investments. Land
Economics. Vol. 64. No. 4
Clark S. Binkley, Charles F. Raper & Courtland L. Washburn. 1995.
Institutional Investment in U.S. Timberland.
Ibbotson Associates. 1997. Based on statistics from Standard & Poor’s 500
Composite Index and Salomon Brothers High-Grade Corporate Bond Index.
Alabama
Cooperative Extension Service Circular ANR-377. How to Analyze Forestry
Profit Potential