 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
|
|
SSR Stage II Intake Development |
|
|
 |
|
|
One of the key objectives of prototyping a SSR Stage II intake is to learn more about how various modifications to a stock 96-98 4V intake affect
performance and driveability. The intent of this write-up is to document the development effort for those who follow. For anyone who reads this write-up and chooses to attempt modifications disclosed in this write-up, please be aware that there are
many details in the development of this intake that are not been discussed or that are discussed only in a topical manner. Accordingly, your results may vary dramatically.
One aspect of the 96-98 head-intake combo that 'seemingly' limits its
performance is that fuel is injected into only a first one of the dual runners (i.e., a primary runner) for delivering the air-fuel mixture to the corresponding cylinder. A second one of the dual runners (i.e., a secondary runner) delivers air, without
the addition of fuel, to the same cylinder. Accordingly, it is necessary for raw air from the secondary runner to be mixed with the air-fuel mixture of the primary runner within the cylinder. This is a less than optimal approach to achieving a desired
a/f mixture within the cylinders. |
|
|
|
Dividerless/Dual Port Fueling Prototype |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
The dividerless/dual port fueling prototype shown above results in the air-fuel mixture being delivered to each cylinder via each of the respective dual
runners. Specifically, the fuel injectors are relocated and the port divider between each pair of runners is deleted for permitting fuel to be injected at a runner position upstream of the primary runner and secondary runner inlets. As shown, the port
dividers in the intake are removed and a fuel boss is added above the IMRC plate. Each stock injector location in the IMRC plate is epoxy-filled. The IMRC plates are modified to include a port divider lead-in for each pair of runners. The intent of
this prototype was to evaluate whether such a fueling approach would provide a more efficient and complete combustion process, thus enhancing power and fuel economy.
It should be noted that the port dividers in each bank of the 96-98 intakes are
not aligned symmetrically with the runners of the heads or the runner passages of the IMRC plates. The port divider of the runner pair at the front of the intake is skewed at a different angle than the port divider of therunner pair at the rear of the
intake. The port dividers of each bank of the intake are at slightly different angles to accommodate the air horn bosses of the intake being more closely spaced together than the ports in the heads. The intent of removing the port dividers is to provide
more uniform air flow between cylinders and to eliminate the flow discontinuity associated with the port dividers. By modifying the IMRC plates to include the port divider lead-in, better uniformity is provided as the IMRC runner passages are symmetric
with the runners in the heads.
When evaluated, the intake resulted in very poor driveability (e.g., poor throttle response and massive hesitation in low-rpm transient throttle conditions). It is believed that the orientation of the injector,
rather than its absolute position, hindered proper fuel atomization/deliver into the cylinders. Due to space constraints, the injectors had to be orientated in a position wherein the fuel spray was directed across the air stream rather than essentially
parallel with it (i.e., aimed toward the back of the valves). This resulted in fuel puddling and lean/rich conditions. At high engine and road speeds (i.e., full throttle in 3rd and 4th gear between 6000 -7400 rpm), the car 'felt;' very strong.
However, driveability made the car difficult and dangerous to drive, so a more complete evaluation was not attempted.
Single pintle and disk type injectors were evaluated. Neither type of injector provided any appreciable difference in
driveability over the other.
Thanks to assistance from Chris Mureen (aka Chris98Vobra), various modifications to some lesser known/used PCM parameters were made possible. Examples of the parameters modified includes parameters relating to
injector delay relative to piston location and parameters relating to fuel puddling/atomization. Unfortunately, none of the PCM modifications resulted in any appreciable improvement in driveability.
Lastly, the port region of the intake adjacent
to each relocated injector was modified with epoxy in an attempt to improve air flow characteristics in this region of each runner. The combined volume of the primary and secondary ports in the 96-98 heads/IMRC plates is considerably greater than the
volume of the air horns. Accordingly, there is an area of less than optimum flow between the air horn and the IMRC plates, particularly once the port divider is removed. While the use of epoxy to enhance transition of airflow from the air horns into the
primary/secondary runners enhanced driveability quite dramatically improved, driveability was still entirely unacceptable.
See the Dividerless Intake Prototype section below for details on the epoxy fillers formed for improving airflow
transition from the air horn into each of the dual runners of the heads. |
|
|
Dividerless/Single Port Fueling Prototype |
|
|
The dividerless/single port fueling prototype shown below moves the injectors back to the stock location and retains the dividerless configuration. This
results in the air-fuel mixture being delivered to each cylinder via only the primary runners of the head. So, any performance gains will be associated solely with the dividerless intake configuration.
This prototype intake has provided
exceptional driveability, without any unusual tuning required. This confirmed speculation that the injector location/orientation was hindering driveability. As for performance gains, there 'seems' to be an improvement in how hard the car pulls through
7K rpm and up to about 7400 rpm. Development of this prototype is on-going. Once a few more 'enhancements' are made, this intake will be dynoed back to back with a SSR Stage I intake. |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Back |
|
|
Copyright 1999-2003 David O. Simmons All rights reserved for contents of this website Unauthorized use of the contents of this website is
prohibited
|
|